Legal Decisions
Written Grounds of Decision will be delivered when the dispute is adjudicated after a full hearing. The summary of all decisions that are issued by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore up till the end of 2010 are provided in this site for information
only. While the full text of decisions from 2010 is also available in this site for information only, the full text and official version of all decisions can be obtained from Lawnet.
Please check Lawnet for any appeals from these decisions to the General Division of the High Court, the Appellate Division of the High Court and the Court of Appeal. We have made every effort to ensure that the information is accurate; however, the
IPOS is not liable for any errors that may arise out of the reporting of the cases.
If you wish to receive our decisions via email, you may subscribe to our mailing list by emailing news@ipos.gov.sg to
let us know so that we can keep you informed in future.
Case Search
You can use this tool to search within the citation or subject IP of decisions issued by IPOS since 1999. You can also search for decisions by type of IP or year of issue. Further, you can search by the grounds of decision for Trademark decisions issued from 2012.
To view pre-2020 legal decisions, please click
here.
2024
AMP Mediation Success - Captain K F&B Management Pte. Ltd & En Dining Bar Holdings Pte. Ltd. [2024] AMP MED 1
Citation | Application Number | Mark / Patent / GI / Design
| Image | Action | Decision |
Google LLC v Green Radar (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2024] SGIPOS 1 | TM No. 40202109944T | grMail | ![40202109944T 40202109944T](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202109944t.png?sfvrsn=86764659_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (446KB)
|
Henkel Polybit Industries Ltd v Polybit Industries Far East Sdn Bhd [2024] SGIPOS 2 | TM Nos. 40202021511R, 40202021496R, 40202021510T, 40202023159Q, 40202023161Q, 40202023160V and 40202021512P | Polybit BITUPLUS, Polybit, Polybit Polyseal PS, Polybit POLYCOAT, Polybit POLYSWELL, Polybit POLYTHANE CT, Polybit BITUSTICK | ![40202021511R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202021511r.png?sfvrsn=11267e03_1)
![40202021496R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202021496rf8cf6acf-c5ff-41d4-9332-bf984685f4e5.png?sfvrsn=bfc911ef_1)
![40202021510T](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202021510t.png?sfvrsn=31d21735_1)
![40202023159Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202023159q.png?sfvrsn=4f546332_1)
![40202023161Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202023161q.png?sfvrsn=648c030a_1)
![40202023160V](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202023160v.png?sfvrsn=b00e98cb_1)
![40202021512P](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202021512p.png?sfvrsn=79decac9_1) | Trade Mark Invalidation and Oppositions (Successful) | Full Decision (747KB) |
In the matter of a trade mark application by BioMedical Research Group Inc. & Anor. [2024] SGIPOS 3 | TM No. 40202112183R | IP-PA1 | ![40202112183R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40202112183r.jpg?sfvrsn=87292282_1) | Trade Mark Ex Parte Hearing (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (447KB) |
CrossFit LLC v Play Distribution Pte Ltd [2024] SGIPOS 4 | TM No. 40201912621Q | CrossFeet | ![40201912621Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/40201912621q.jpg?sfvrsn=2d55306a_1) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (497KB) |
Bytedance Ltd v Dol Technology Pte Ltd [2024] SGIPOS 5 | TM Nos. 40202112759X and 40202118455Y | Tiki | ![Tiki](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2024/tiki.png?sfvrsn=7c7f505d_1) | Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (687KB) |
2023
Mediation Success at IPOS - Gan Eng Joo Onassis & SG Mr Kopi Private Limited [2023] SGIPOS MED 1
Mediation Success at IPOS - Kibbles Pte. Ltd. & Mr Kibbles Pte. Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS MED 2
AMP Mediation Success - Chew's Optics & Chew's Optics (Bishan), Chew's Optics (Kovan) [2023] AMP MED 1
IPOS Cases in 2023 - Selected Issues, Holdings and Comments of Interest
Citation | Application Number | Mark / Patent / GI / Design
| Image | Action | Decision |
In the matter of a Trade Mark Application by Schweiger, Martin Rainer Gabriel [2023] SGIPOS 1
| TM No. 40202027520W | STRONG BY CHOICE | ![40202027520W 40202027520W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40202027520w.jpg?sfvrsn=b58a4159_0) | Trade Mark Ex Parte Hearing (Successful) | Full Decision (314KB)
|
Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd v Baidu Europe BV [2023] SGIPOS 2 | TM Nos. 40201605922U and 40201613994V | BAIDU | ![40201605922U 40201605922U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201605922u.png?sfvrsn=2c8f4159_0)
![40201613994V 40201613994V](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201613994v.jpg?sfvrsn=1e8f4159_0)
| Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Full Decision (964KB)
|
Soon Ailing v Chen & Partners (S) Pte. Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS 3 | Design No. 30202008442T | Customized Watch Bezel
| ![30202008442T 30202008442T](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/30202008442t.jpg?sfvrsn=5abf4159_0) | Design Revocation (Successful) | Registrar's Decision (4MB)
|
Yap Fei Fei v Chuan Hong Seng Pte. Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS 4 | TM No. 40202001309U | SOFEI gold | ![40202001309U 40202001309U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40202001309u.png?sfvrsn=abbf4159_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (342KB)
|
NCL Corporation v Norwegian Brand Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS 5 | TM No. 40201709794W | norwegian | ![40201709794W 40201709794W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201709794w.png?sfvrsn=9f4e4159_0) | Trade Mark Opposition (Partially Successful) | Full Decision (587KB)
Case Summary (97KB)
|
TM No. 40201709795R | norwegian.com | ![40201709795R 40201709795R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201709795r.png?sfvrsn=ff4e4159_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) |
Vetements Group AG v Xiamen VETEMENTS Brand Management co,LTD. [2023] SGIPOS 6
| TM No. 40201913752Y | VETEMENTS | ![40201913752Y 40201913752Y](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201913752y.png?sfvrsn=171f4159_0)
| Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Registrar's Decision (230KB)
|
HMV Brand Pte. Ltd. v Yongfeng Trade Co., Limited [2023] SGIPOS 7
| TM No. 40201916470P | Dog and gramophone | ![40201916470P 40201916470P](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201916470p.png?sfvrsn=45ff4059_0) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Full Decision (536KB)
|
Nidec Control Techniques Limited v Uni-Drive Systems (S) Pte Ltd [2023] SGIPOS 8
| TM Nos. T9712703Z and T9712704H | UNI-DRIVE | ![T9712703Z T9712703Z](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/t9712703z.png?sfvrsn=ed8b4059_0)
![T9712704H T9712704H](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/t9712704h.png?sfvrsn=df8b4059_0)
| Trade Mark Revocation (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (1MB)
|
Coinbase, Inc. v bitFlyer Inc. [2023] SGIPOS 9
| TM No. 40201614827X | coinbase | ![40201614827X 40201614827X](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201614827x.png?sfvrsn=95b94059_0)
| Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful)
| Full Decision (590KB)
Case Summary (86KB)
|
In the matter of a trade mark application by Louis Vuitton Malletier [2023] SGIPOS 10
| TM No. 40202106900P | flowers quatrefoil pattern | ![40202106900P 40202106900P](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40202106900p.png?sfvrsn=70be4059_0)
| Trade Mark Ex Parte Hearing (Partially Successful) | Full Decision (462KB)
|
ZERODENSITY YAZILIM ANONIM SIRKETI v Novel Brands USA LLC [2023] SGIPOS 11
| TM No. 40201925975W
| REALITY ENGINE | ![40201925975W 40201925975W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201925975w.png?sfvrsn=65574059_0) | Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (394KB)
|
Outschool Inc v ALLSCHOOLS PTE LTD [2023] SGIPOS 12 | TM Nos. 40202122482Y, 40202122483R, 40202122484Q, and 40202122485U | ALLSCHOOL | ![ALLSCHOOL ALLSCHOOL](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/allschool.jpg?sfvrsn=97214759_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (505KB) |
Appeal to General Division of the High Court Pending | HC/TA 1/2024 |
Monster Energy Company v IICOMBINED Co., Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS 13
| TM No. 40201902574X | GENTLE MONSTER | ![40201902574X 40201902574X](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40201902574x.png?sfvrsn=21c44659_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (577KB)
|
Monster Energy Company v YG Entertainment Inc [2023] SGIPOS 14
| TM Nos. 40202013352R and 40202109370Q | BABYMONSTER, BABYMONSTERS | ![40202013352R 40202109370Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40202013352r.png?sfvrsn=f9c94659_0)
![40202109370Q 40202109370Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2023/40202109370q.png?sfvrsn=ebc94659_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (937KB)
|
2022
Mediation at IPOS - Leonid Kovalkov & JNBK Group Private Limited [2022] SGIPOS MED 1
Mediation Success at IPOS - Spiral Foods Pty Ltd & Nature’s Glory Pte Ltd [2022] SGIPOS MED 2
Mediation Success at IPOS - Worldwide Bible Society (Singapore) & The Bible Society of Singapore [2022] SGIPOS MED 3
IPOS Cases in 2022 - Selected Issues, Holdings and Comments of Interest
Citation | Application Number | Mark / Patent / GI | Mark Image | Action | Decision |
Daimler AG v Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 1 | TM No. 40201722025Y-02 | VIVO | ![40201722025Y-02 40201722025Y-02](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201722025y-02.png?sfvrsn=caad4359_0) | Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (432KB)
|
Choi Sun Mi v Comfort Lab Inc. [2022] SGIPOS 2 | TM No. T1212409Z | COMFORTLAB | ![T1212409Z T1212409Z](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/t1212409z.jpg?sfvrsn=6a414359_0)
| Trade Mark Revocation (Successful) | Full Decision (451KB)
|
Hotel Cipriani S.P.A. v Altunis - Trading, Gestão E Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, LDA [2022] SGIPOS 3 | TM No. 40201904595S | CIPRIANI | ![40201904595S 40201904595S](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201904595s.png?sfvrsn=e04c4359_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (507KB)
|
Twitter, Inc. v V V Technology Pte Ltd [2022] SGIPOS 4
| TM No. 40201818292X | Bird device | ![40201818292X 40201818292X](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201818292x.png?sfvrsn=3e4d4359_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (1MB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision upheld) | [2022] SGHC 293 |
BEABA v Biba (Zhejiang) Nursing Products Co., Ltd [2022] SGIPOS 5
| TM Nos. 40201909817Y and 40201909820Q | BEABA | ![BEABA BEABA](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/beaba.png?sfvrsn=14714359_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (1MB) |
Sociedad Anonima Damm v Hijos de Rivera, S.A. [2022] SGIPOS 6 | TM No. 40201910153U | Estrella Galicia | ![40201910153U 40201910153U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201910153u.png?sfvrsn=6714359_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (582KB) |
Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano v Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 7
| GI No. 50201900057U | Parmigiano Reggiano
| ![50201900057U 50201900057U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/50201900057u.png?sfvrsn=870c4359_0)
| Geographical Indication Opposition to Qualification of Rights (Successful) | Registrar's Decision (289KB)
|
In the matter of a Trade Mark Application by Arangur UG (haftungsbeschrankt) [2022] SGIPOS 8
| TM No. 40202006901U | PARTY LIKE GATSBY
| ![40202006901U 40202006901U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40202006901u.png?sfvrsn=803a4359_0)
| Trade Mark Ex Parte Hearing (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (364KB)
|
In the matter of a Trade Mark Application by Floor Xpert Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 9
| TM No. 40201800571T-02 | FLOOR XPERT | ![40201800571T-02 40201800571T-02](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201800571t-02.png?sfvrsn=93db4259_0)
| Trade Mark Ex Parte Hearing (Successful) | Full Decision (422KB) |
Pauline New Ping Ping v Eng’s Char Siew Wantan Mee Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 10
| TM Nos. 40201811254U, 40201814979U and 40201814978P | ENG'S, Chinese characters "Rong Gao" | ![40201811254U 40201811254U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201811254u.png?sfvrsn=48b94259_0)
![40201814979U 40201814979U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201814979u.jpg?sfvrsn=bab94259_0)
![40201814978P 40201814978P](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201814978p.png?sfvrsn=a4b94259_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (602KB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision upheld) | HC/TA 7/2022 No Written Grounds of Decision available |
Application for permission to appeal dismissed by the Appellate Division of the High Court | AD/OA 23/2023 |
Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano v Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 11
| GI No. 50201900057U | Parmigiano Reggiano | ![50201900057U 50201900057U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/50201900057u.png?sfvrsn=870c4359_0)
| Geographical Indication Opposition to Qualification of Rights (Successful) | Full Decision (433KB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision upheld) | [2023] SGHC 77 |
Appeal to Court of Appeal Pending | CA/CA 37/2023 |
The a2 Milk Company Limited v Société des Produits Nestlé S.A [2022] SGIPOS 12
| TM No. 40201904038W | S-26 Pro-Atwo | ![40201904038W 40201904038W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201904038w.jpg?sfvrsn=a9a74259_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (434KB)
|
Swatch AG (Swatch SA) (Swatch Ltd.) v Apple Inc. [2022] SGIPOS 13
| TM No. 40201818395R | THINK DIFFERENT | ![40201818395R 40201818395R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201818395r.png?sfvrsn=84534259_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (462KB)
|
GCIH Trademarks Limited v Hardwood Private Limited [2022] SGIPOS 14
| TM No. 40201913705S | OT Tango | ![40201913705S 40201913705S](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201913705s.png?sfvrsn=6a3f4259_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (592KB)
|
Tata Sons Private Limited v Tata’s Natural Alchemy, LLC [2022] SGIPOS 15
| TM No. 40201821182U | TATA HARPER | ![40201821182U 40201821182U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201821182u.png?sfvrsn=24da4159_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful)
| Full Decision (1MB)
|
Skins IP Limited v Symphony Holdings Limited [2022] SGIPOS 16
| TM No. T0913773I | SKINS | ![T0913773I T0913773I](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/t0913773i.png?sfvrsn=fafa4159_0) | Trade Mark Revocation (Partially Successful) | Full Decision (484KB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (Respondent did not attend hearing; IPOS decision partially reversed)
| HC/TA 11/2022 No Written Grounds of Decision available |
The a2 Milk Company Limited v Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. [2022] SGIPOS 17
| TM Nos. 40201907176S and 40201926155W | Atwo illuma and Atwo illumcare | ![40201907176S 40201907176S](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/atwo-illuma.jpg?sfvrsn=a2ff4159_0)
![40201926155W 40201926155W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/atwo-illumcare.png?sfvrsn=8cff4159_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (574KB)
|
Aramara Beauty LLC (dba Glow Recipe) v Sinchen Group Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 18
| TM No. 40201917164W | GLOW RECIPE | ![40201917164W 40201917164W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40201917164w.jpeg?sfvrsn=fc944159_0) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Registrar's Decision (155KB)
|
Fair Isaac Corporation v LAC Co., Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 19
| TM No. 40202003885Q | CloudFalcon | ![40202003885Q 40202003885Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2022/40202003885q.jpg?sfvrsn=628a4159_0) | Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (603KB)
|
2021
Reflection on an IP Mediation by a Young IP Mediator - Stratech Systems Limited, The Stratech Group Limited & Chew Rong-Qi Phoebe, Chew Rong-Jie David [2021] SGIPOS MED 1
Mediation Success at IPOS - K & Q Brothers Electrical Engineering Co. Pte. Ltd. & K&Q Fatt Pte Ltd, Quek Jia Ling, Quek Hong Peng, Quek Jia Hao [2021] SGIPOS MED 2
IPOS Cases in 2021 - Selected Issues, Holdings and Comments of Interest
Citation | Application Number | Mark / Patent / GI | Mark Image | Action | Decision |
Application for Extension of Time to File Evidence in a Trade Mark Opposition by BEABA and Objection Thereto by Biba (Zhejiang) Nursing Products Co., Ltd [2021] SGIPOS 1 | TM No. 40201909817Y | BEABA | ![40201909817Y 40201909817Y](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201909817y.jpg?sfvrsn=83a97f59_0) | Trade Mark Interlocutory Hearing | Full Decision (282KB)
|
Xiaomi Inc. v MiChat Pte Ltd [2021] SGIPOS 2 | TM No. 40201810931X-02 | MiChat | ![40201810931X 40201810931X](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201810931x.jpg?sfvrsn=ef5e7f59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (634KB)
Case Summary (214KB)
|
TM No. 40201810931X-01 | Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) |
Appeal to General Division of the High Court for TM No. 40201810931X-01 (IPOS decision reversed) | HC/TA 5/2021 No written Grounds of Decision available |
B.R. v Elements Cosmeceuticals Pte. Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 3 | TM No. 40201721937Q | Recherché | ![40201721937Q 40201721937Q](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201721937q.jpg?sfvrsn=385f7f59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Successful)
| Full Decision (458KB)
|
Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated v Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco [2021] SGIPOS 4
| GI No. 50201900088S | PROSECCO | ![50201900088S 50201900088S](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/50201900088s.jpg?sfvrsn=f6e47e59_0)
| Geographical Indication Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Registrar's Decision (201KB)
|
Application for Extension of Time to File Evidence in a Trade Mark Revocation by Symphony Holdings Limited and Objection Thereto by Skins IP Limited [2021] SGIPOS 5
| TM No. T0913773I | SKINS | ![T0913773I T0913773I](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/t0913773i.jpg?sfvrsn=c4867e59_2)
| Trade Mark Interlocutory Hearing | Full Decision (280KB)
|
GCIH Trademarks Limited v Hardwood Private Limited [2021] SGIPOS 6
| TM No. 40201810134U | OT TANGO | ![40201810134U 40201810134U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201810134u.jpg?sfvrsn=70b27e59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (505KB)
|
Warrior Pte Ltd v Nippon Paint (Singapore) Co. Pte. Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 7 | TM No. 40201909725V | NW1 | ![40201909725V 40201909725V](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201909725v.jpg?sfvrsn=1ba97e59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (1MB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision upheld) | HC/TA 16/2021 No written Grounds of Decision available |
Baidu Europe B.V. v Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 8
| TM No. T1010624H | Baidu, Chinese characters "Bai Du" | ![T1010624H T1010624H](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/t1010624h.jpg?sfvrsn=3e487e59_0)
| Trade Mark Revocation (Successful for Class 38, Unsuccessful for Class 42) | Full Decision (610KB)
|
Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated v Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco [2021] SGIPOS 9
| GI No. 50201900088S
| PROSECCO
| ![50201900088S 50201900088S](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/50201900088s.jpg?sfvrsn=f6e47e59_0)
| Geographical Indication Opposition (Unsuccessful)
| Full Decision (1MB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision reversed on Section 41(1)(f)) | [2022] SGHC 33 |
Appeal to Court of Appeal (IPOS decision upheld) | [2023] SGCA 37 |
Combe International Ltd. v Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel [2021] SGIPOS 10
| TM No. 40201816895W
| Dr. Wolff's Vagisan
| ![40201816895W 40201816895W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201816895w.png?sfvrsn=9cf77c59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful)
| Full Decision (392KB)
Case Summary (105KB)
|
Appeal to General Division of the High Court (IPOS decision upheld) | [2022] SGHC 78 |
Technopharma Limited v Unilever PLC [2021] SGIPOS 11
| TM Nos. T8802249B, T0808259J and T0404547Z | Fair & Lovely | ![T8802249B T8802249B](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/t8802249b.png?sfvrsn=bbee7c59_0)
![T0808259J T0808259J](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/t0808259j.png?sfvrsn=a5ee7c59_0)
![T0404547Z T0404547Z](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/t0404547z.png?sfvrsn=94ee7c59_0)
| Trade Mark Revocation (Successful) | Full Decision (1MB)
Case Summary (193KB)
|
Shenzhen Meixixi Catering Management Co., Ltd. v Heetea Pte. Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 12
| TM No. 40201708586R | HEYTEA | ![40201708586R 40201708586R](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201708586r.png?sfvrsn=3c4d7c59_0) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Full Decision (436KB)
|
Louis Vuitton Malletier v Human Horizons Holding (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 13
| TM No. 40201821074P-02 | HUMAN HORIZONS | ![40201821074P-02 40201821074P-02](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201821074p-02.png?sfvrsn=664f7c59_0) | Trade Mark Opposition (Successful) | Full Decision (403KB)
Case Summary (119KB)
|
Monster Energy Company v Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Limited [2021] SGIPOS 14 | TM No. 40201810156W | NOISY BEAST | ![40201810156W 40201810156W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201810156w.png?sfvrsn=49197c59_0)
| Trade Mark Opposition (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (378KB)
|
Weider Global Nutrition, LLC v Morinaga & Co., Ltd [2021] SGIPOS 15
| TM No. 40201711769U
| in | ![40201711769U 40201711769U](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201711769u.png?sfvrsn=42037c59_0) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Successful) | Full Decision (476KB)
|
S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v Off-White LLC [2021] SGIPOS 16
| TM No. 40201908644W | OFF | ![40201908644W 40201908644W](/images/default-source/resources/hearings-mediation/legal-decisions/2021/40201908644w.png?sfvrsn=a0237c59_0) | Trade Mark Invalidation (Unsuccessful) | Full Decision (381KB) |
2020
Mediation Success at IPOS - Eley Trading Sdn Bhd & Kwek Soo Chuan [2020] SGIPOS MED 1
Mediation Success at IPOS - Gromark Consumers Enterprise Pte. Ltd. & GK Laboratory (Asia) Pte. Ltd. [2020] SGIPOS MED 2
IPOS Cases in 2020 - Selected Issues, Holdings and Comments of Interest